NEWS
Focus On High-Quality Silicate (Ceramic) Materials
STPP vs Ceramic Deflocculant: A Data-Driven Guide for Cost & Performance
Key Takeaways for Ceramic Manufacturers
- Both STPP and ceramic deflocculants can be effective dispersants for ceramic body slurry — the choice depends on process conditions, not a universal ranking.
- STPP FG-1003 provides high purity (Na₅P₃O₁₀ 94%, Fe₂O₃ 0.015%) and consistent pH contribution (8.0–9.0), suitable for formulas with strict whiteness or purity requirements. (Source: Goway Technical Data Sheet)
- Ceramic deflocculant FG-2017 (NaO 30–32%, L.O.I 55–60%) offers a different ionic deflocculation pathway and may be evaluated where alternative cost structures are sought, depending on formula and sourcing conditions. (Source: Goway Technical Data Sheet)
- Total additive cost per ton of body — not unit price — is the correct comparison metric.
- Any formulation switch requires a structured lab trial before full-scale application. Parameters to monitor: Ford Cup flow time, slurry specific gravity, green body strength, and fired whiteness.
Choosing between Sodium Tripolyphosphate (STPP) and a purpose-formulated ceramic deflocculant is one of the most common technical-commercial decisions in ceramic body preparation. Both products serve the same primary function — dispersing clay particles to reduce slurry viscosity and improve flow — but they differ in chemical mechanism, dosage profile, process stability, and total cost structure.
This guide compares the two options across five critical dimensions, presents a data-verified cost model, and provides a practical switching protocol. All specifications referenced are drawn from Goway's Technical Data Sheets (TDS). Process performance claims include the conditions under which they apply.
1. What Is Sodium Tripolyphosphate (STPP)?
Sodium Tripolyphosphate (STPP), chemical formula Na₅P₃O₁₀ (CAS: 7758-29-4), is an inorganic polyphosphate dispersant widely used in ceramic body slurry preparation. In ceramic applications, STPP works primarily by chelating calcium and magnesium ions in the slurry water and clay system, reducing electrostatic attraction between clay particles and improving flowability at lower water content.
Common uses in ceramics:
- Body slurry deflocculation in wall tile, floor tile, and porcelain tile production
- Used alone or in combination with Sodium Hexametaphosphate (SHMP) in hard-water or high-calcium-clay systems
- Applied in spray drying operations where slurry specific gravity and flow time stability are critical
Goway STPP product grades for ceramic applications (all data: Source: Goway Technical Data Sheet):
| Grade | Whiteness | P₂O₅ (%) | Na₅P₃O₁₀ (%) | Insoluble Matter (%) | Fe₂O₃ (%) | pH (1% solution) | Typical Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG-1003 | 90 | 56 | 94 | 0.1 | 0.015 | 8.0–9.0 | High-purity ceramic body; strict whiteness or Fe-content requirements |
| FG-N5 | 85 | 36 | 90 | 0.1 | 0.015 | 9.2–10 | General ceramic body; moderate pH contribution |
| FG-N8 | 83 | 20 | 90 | 0.1 | 0.015 | 11–12 | Applications requiring higher pH deflocculation |
| FG-N9 | 80 | 12 | 90 | 0.1 | 0.015 | 11–12 | Cost-sensitive applications; lower P₂O₅ content |
All values from Goway Technical Data Sheet. Final parameters should be verified against the latest batch COA.
2. What Is a Ceramic Deflocculant?
A ceramic deflocculant — also referred to as a compound dispersant or slurry thinner — is a purpose-formulated additive for ceramic body slurry. Unlike single-component STPP, compound ceramic deflocculants typically contain a combination of sodium silicate, phosphate compounds, and other ionic agents, achieving deflocculation through a broader multi-ionic mechanism. This may allow effective performance at lower dosage in certain clay and water systems.
Common uses in ceramics:
- Full or partial replacement for STPP in ceramic body slurry, particularly where different cost or process profiles are sought
- Applications with variable water quality or moderately hard water, where multi-component dispersants may provide broader ionic coverage
- Production environments where dosage flexibility or an alternative cost structure is a priority
Goway Ceramic Deflocculant product grades (all data: Source: Goway Technical Data Sheet):
| Grade | NaO (%) | SiO₂ (%) | P₂O₅ (%) | L.O.I (%) | Key Characteristic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG-2017 | 30–32 | — | 0–1 | 55–60 | High NaO, minimal phosphate; strong ionic deflocculation |
| FG-MK03 | 12–15 | 20–22 | 1–2 | 55–65 | Combined silicate + phosphate; moderate NaO |
| FG-N203B | 15–18 | 30–33 | 0–1 | 45–50 | Higher SiO₂ content; suitable for silicate-dominant deflocculation |
| FG-SL01A | 18–20 | 18–20 | 1–2 | 55–60 | Balanced NaO and SiO₂; combined mechanism |
All values from Goway Technical Data Sheet. Final parameters should be verified against the latest batch COA. Laboratory trials are recommended before full-scale application.
3. Chemical Composition Comparison
Understanding the compositional difference between STPP and ceramic deflocculants is the foundation for predicting slurry behavior. The two product types differ not just in purity, but in the underlying ionic mechanism through which they disperse clay particles.
| Property | STPP FG-1003 | Deflocculant FG-2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical type | Single-component inorganic polyphosphate | Compound ceramic dispersant (multi-ionic) |
| Primary active component | Na₅P₃O₁₀ (STPP, 94%) | High-NaO compound (NaO 30–32%) |
| P₂O₅ content | 56% | 0–1% (minimal phosphate) |
| SiO₂ content | Not applicable | — (FG-2017 does not contain SiO₂) |
| Fe₂O₃ content | 0.015% | Not specified in TDS (request COA) |
| L.O.I | Not specified in TDS as L.O.I metric | 55–60% |
| pH contribution (1% solution) | 8.0–9.0 (mildly alkaline) | Dependent on NaO level; typically alkaline |
| Primary deflocculation mechanism | Phosphate chelation of Ca²⁺/Mg²⁺; electrostatic repulsion | Multi-ionic: sodium ion exchange + high-NaO ionic shielding |
| Whiteness contribution | Whiteness 90 — low Fe₂O₃ minimizes color impact | Not specified as whiteness metric in TDS (request COA) |
Source: Goway Technical Data Sheet. Data is for FG-1003 and FG-2017 specifically. Do not apply to other grades without separate verification.
4. Performance Comparison Matrix
The following matrix compares STPP and ceramic deflocculants across the performance dimensions most relevant to ceramic body slurry preparation. All descriptions reflect the compositional and mechanism differences established above. Process outcome claims use the conditional language required by Goway SOP — actual results depend on your clay system, water quality, and dosage.
| Decision Factor | STPP (e.g., FG-1003) | Ceramic Deflocculant (e.g., FG-2017) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary mechanism | Phosphate chelation of Ca²⁺/Mg²⁺; reduces inter-particle attraction | Multi-ionic mechanism via high-NaO compound; broader ionic coverage |
| Deflocculation efficiency at standard dose | Well-characterized; consistent behavior in established formulas | Depends on grade and clay system; may achieve comparable flow at different dosage |
| Purity & impurity control | High: Na₅P₃O₁₀ 94%, Fe₂O₃ 0.015%, Insoluble Matter 0.1% DATA | Compound formulation; Fe₂O₃ not listed in TDS — request batch COA for verification |
| pH contribution | Mild: 8.0–9.0 (FG-1003) — predictable, within typical ceramic slurry range | Higher alkalinity likely due to elevated NaO content; verify before use in pH-sensitive systems |
| Sensitivity to hard water | Moderate — can be consumed by Ca²⁺/Mg²⁺; STPP+SHMP combination used in hard-water systems | Multi-ionic formulation may provide broader performance across varying water quality; evaluate under plant conditions |
| Fired body whiteness impact | Low Fe₂O₃ (0.015%) minimizes discoloration risk in most ceramic systems (Source: Goway TDS, FG-1003) | Whiteness impact not characterized in TDS; request COA and conduct fired trial before use in high-whiteness applications |
| Solubility & dissolution | Solid powder; requires proper dissolution in slurry water before addition | L.O.I 55–60% (FG-2017) suggests significant volatile content; dissolution behavior differs from STPP powder (Source: Goway TDS) |
| Process stability | Well-documented behavior; widely used as reference baseline in formula development | Requires slurry stability monitoring in any new application; behavior can vary across formulations |
| Best use scenario | May be more suitable when: strict purity control is needed; whiteness is a priority; formula is well-established; or STPP-based dosage curves are already available | May be more suitable when: evaluating alternative cost structures; existing STPP formula shows room for optimization; multi-ionic coverage may be advantageous for your clay system |
Selection notes are evaluative, not prescriptive. Actual performance depends on clay system, water quality, dosage, and process parameters. Conduct laboratory trials under plant conditions before full-scale application.
4.1 Deflocculation Mechanism — Why the Mechanism Matters
Both STPP and ceramic deflocculants disperse clay particles in aqueous slurry, but through different pathways:
- STPP works via the polyphosphate chain binding to Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ ions in the water and on clay particle surfaces, reducing the bridging forces between particles and creating electrostatic repulsion. This mechanism is well-studied and relatively predictable across different clay types.
- Compound ceramic deflocculants such as FG-2017 (NaO 30–32%) work primarily through a high-sodium ion exchange mechanism, potentially combined with other ionic contributions from the formulation. The high L.O.I (55–60%) of FG-2017 indicates a significant proportion of volatile or water-associated components that contribute to the dispersant's behavior in aqueous systems.
The practical implication: because the mechanisms differ, optimum dosage is unlikely to be the same weight-for-weight, and slurry response (flow time curve, pH stability, thixotropy) may differ. This makes side-by-side trial testing essential.
4.2 Impurity Profile and Fired Body Quality
For applications where fired whiteness or color consistency is a critical requirement:
- STPP FG-1003's Fe₂O₃ content of 0.015% (Source: Goway TDS, FG-1003) is designed to minimize iron contribution to the fired body.
- Ceramic deflocculant FG-2017's Fe₂O₃ content is not listed in the TDS as a specified parameter. For applications sensitive to iron content, request a batch COA before adoption and conduct a fired body trial to assess whiteness impact.
5. Cost Comparison Model
Unit purchase price is not the correct metric for comparing the cost of two dispersants with different dosage profiles. The appropriate metric is total additive cost per ton of ceramic body produced. This section presents the calculation framework. Specific market prices are not provided here as they are subject to sourcing conditions and market fluctuation — use your actual procurement price to calculate.
Cost Model: Total Additive Cost Per Ton of Body
Variables you must determine from your own trial data:
- Unit price: Your actual procurement price (CNY or USD per kg) for each product under your sourcing conditions
- Dosage rate for STPP: Your current STPP addition per ton of dry body (kg/ton). This is your established baseline.
- Dosage rate for deflocculant: Must be determined by slurry trial — not assumed to equal STPP dosage. The trial starting point for FG-2017 should be discussed with Goway technical team based on your clay system and target flow time.
Note: The above is a calculation framework. Goway does not provide market price comparisons or claim that one product is cheaper than another. Total cost depends on your sourcing conditions and trial-verified dosage. Laboratory trials are recommended before full-scale application.
5.1 Beyond Unit Price: Additional Cost Factors to Consider
| Cost Factor | STPP FG-1003 | Ceramic Deflocculant FG-2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage requirements | Dry powder; standard sealed packaging; moisture-sensitive — store in dry warehouse | L.O.I 55–60% indicates significant volatiles; check storage requirements on SDS before procurement |
| Handling complexity | Solid powder; weighed and dissolved per batch — established procedure in most plants | Confirm physical form (solid/liquid) from TDS or COA; handling procedure may differ from STPP |
| Formula adjustment cost | Zero if switching back from deflocculant — existing formula is the baseline | Requires dosage optimization trial (time, material, technician labor); one-time cost before full adoption |
| Quality risk cost | Well-characterized product; low risk of unexpected batch variation with consistent supplier | New adoption carries process risk during transition; batch COA monitoring recommended for first 10–20 batches |
| Water treatment interaction | May be partially consumed in very hard water; STPP+SHMP combination may be needed | Multi-ionic mechanism may perform differently in hard vs. soft water; evaluate under actual water conditions |
Cost factor descriptions are based on chemical and compositional characteristics from Goway TDS. Actual operational costs depend on plant-specific conditions.
6. Stability and Process Compatibility
6.1 Slurry Stability
| Stability Factor | STPP (FG-1003) | Ceramic Deflocculant (FG-2017) |
|---|---|---|
| Storage shelf life (product) | Solid inorganic; moisture-sensitive but inherently stable when sealed | Confirm shelf life on SDS; L.O.I 55–60% warrants storage verification |
| pH stability in slurry | Contributes pH 8.0–9.0 (FG-1003); well within standard ceramic slurry range; predictable | High NaO content (30–32%) indicates alkaline contribution; monitor slurry pH during initial trials |
| Sensitivity to water quality | Moderate — Ca²⁺/Mg²⁺ in hard water can reduce deflocculation efficiency; monitor TDS of process water | Multi-ionic mechanism may show different sensitivity profile to water hardness; evaluate under plant water conditions |
| Batch-to-batch consistency | High-purity single-component product; low variation risk when sourced consistently. Request batch COA for verification. | Compound formulation — request batch COA and verify key parameters (NaO, SiO₂) for each incoming batch |
| Thixotropy interaction | Standard dosage range is well-characterized; thixotropy typically manageable with established dosage | Different ionic mechanism may affect slurry thixotropy differently; measure Ford Cup flow time at rest and after agitation during trials |
Stability assessments are based on compositional characteristics from Goway TDS. Plant-specific conditions will affect actual performance. Confirm with latest batch COA.
6.2 Compatibility with Other Additives
- STPP + SHMP combination: STPP is commonly combined with Sodium Hexametaphosphate (SHMP) in ceramic body formulas, particularly in hard-water or high-calcium clay systems where the two phosphate dispersants provide complementary ionic coverage. This combination is well-established in ceramic practice. (Source: general ceramic industry practice; verify with Goway technical team for specific system.)
- Ceramic deflocculant + STPP partial combination: In some transition scenarios, a partial substitution approach is used — maintaining a proportion of STPP while introducing a deflocculant. This can allow gradual slurry adjustment. The appropriate ratio depends on your clay system and target slurry parameters; consult Goway technical team for formula guidance.
- Interaction with ceramic body binders: Both STPP and ceramic deflocculants are used in body slurry. If your formula includes ceramic body binders, verify compatibility — especially pH sensitivity of organic binders — before changing dispersant type.
7. Switching Guide: STPP to Ceramic Deflocculant
If you are evaluating a switch from STPP to a ceramic deflocculant for your production line, the following protocol provides a structured approach. This is a general framework based on ceramic slurry engineering principles — specific parameters must be verified under your plant conditions.
5-Step Transition Protocol
Before starting any trial, document your current STPP formula parameters precisely:
- STPP grade and dosage (kg/ton dry body or as % of dry body weight)
- Slurry specific gravity (target and acceptable range)
- Ford Cup flow time (target value and tolerance)
- Slurry water content (%)
- Green body strength (if measured — see green strength guide)
- Fired body whiteness (if relevant)
Before running any trial, obtain the full technical documentation for the specific deflocculant grade you are evaluating (e.g., FG-2017, FG-MK03, FG-N203B, or FG-SL01A). Confirm NaO, SiO₂, P₂O₅, and L.O.I values against the TDS. Request the latest batch COA for Fe₂O₃ and any impurity parameters relevant to your fired body quality requirements. → Request FG-2017 TDS and COA from Goway
Do not start with a single dosage estimate. A 5-point dosage trial is the recommended minimum:
- Trial points: 0.10% → 0.20% → 0.30% → 0.40% → 0.50% (as % of dry body weight, or adjust starting point based on Goway technical recommendation for your clay system)
- Measure at each point: Ford Cup flow time / slurry specific gravity / slurry water content
- Identify the dosage that matches or approaches your STPP baseline flow time at the same or lower water content
- Run a minimum of n = 3 replicates per dosage point for statistical reliability
Once a candidate dosage is identified in Step 3, produce test green bodies and evaluate:
- Green body strength (MOR, per GB/T 3810 or equivalent method)
- Edge and corner integrity after drying and handling
- Fired body whiteness (if applicable)
- Surface quality and defect inspection (cracks, black core)
After laboratory validation, run a monitored production-scale trial (typically 5–10 batches) before fully replacing STPP:
- Monitor slurry parameters batch-by-batch during the trial period
- Track spray drying performance (powder moisture, bulk density) for any changes
- Confirm fired body quality on production-scale output
- Document any formula or process adjustments required
Scenario: Evaluating deflocculant adoption in a wall tile production line
A ceramic body production team was evaluating whether to introduce a compound ceramic deflocculant alongside their existing STPP formula. The evaluation criteria were: (1) maintaining Ford Cup flow time within ±3 seconds of the STPP baseline, (2) no reduction in green body edge integrity, and (3) acceptable fired whiteness on their standard clay blend.
The evaluation followed a structured 5-point dosage trial. The team found that achieving target slurry parameters required a different dosage (by weight) than STPP, confirming that weight-for-weight substitution was not valid. Fired body whiteness was verified against a batch COA before adoption.
Note: This scenario is presented as an illustrative engineering evaluation framework. It describes a structured trial approach. Specific outcomes depend on clay system, water quality, and dosage — and must be verified under plant conditions. (Engineering Assessment Scenario)
8. Which One Should You Choose?
There is no universally correct answer between STPP and a ceramic deflocculant. The appropriate choice depends on process conditions, formula requirements, and sourcing context. The matrix below maps decision priorities to product considerations.
| If your priority is... | Consider... | Selection Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Strict purity control & iron minimization | STPP FG-1003 | Fe₂O₃ 0.015% and Na₅P₃O₁₀ 94% provide clearly specified purity. Suitable when body color or iron content is a specification requirement. (Source: Goway TDS, FG-1003) |
| Well-established formula stability | STPP FG-1003 or FG-N5 | STPP behavior is well-characterized across a wide range of clay systems. If the current formula is performing to target, the value of switching dispersant type should be weighed against transition risk. |
| Evaluating alternative cost structure | Ceramic Deflocculant FG-2017 or FG-SL01A | May be worth evaluating when total additive cost per ton of body (at trial-verified dosage) is lower than STPP under your sourcing conditions. Cost comparison requires trial-confirmed dosage — not unit price alone. |
| Variable water quality / moderate hard water | FG-MK03 or FG-SL01A (SiO₂-containing grades) or STPP+SHMP combination | Both approaches can be evaluated. Multi-ionic deflocculants may provide broader coverage; STPP+SHMP is an established protocol in hard-water ceramic body production. Verify under plant water conditions. |
| High-volume, cost-sensitive production | Evaluate both options with trial-verified dosage | At high production volume, even small differences in dosage efficiency translate to significant total cost differences. Proper trial data (not price list comparison) is required to make a reliable decision. |
| Regulatory / compliance documentation | STPP FG-1003 | STPP is a well-documented inorganic compound with established SDS/REACH documentation. For markets requiring detailed regulatory documentation, confirm SDS availability before adopting any new additive. |
Selection notes are evaluative and conditional — not absolute recommendations. Actual suitability depends on your specific clay system, process parameters, and sourcing conditions.
9. Common Mistakes When Choosing Between STPP and a Deflocculant
- Comparing unit price instead of total cost per ton of body
The correct comparison metric is: (unit price) × (dosage per ton body) for each product. A lower-priced product at a higher dosage may cost more per ton. Always trial-verify dosage before making a cost comparison. - Assuming 1:1 weight substitution is valid
Because STPP (Na₅P₃O₁₀ 94%) and FG-2017 (NaO 30–32%) act through different chemical mechanisms, the same weight addition of each product will not produce equivalent slurry deflocculation. A 5-point dosage curve trial is required to identify the effective dosage for the deflocculant under your clay system. - Skipping fired body verification when Fe₂O₃ data is unavailable
For applications where fired body whiteness or color consistency is a requirement, verify Fe₂O₃ content via a batch COA before adopting any new dispersant. Whiteness impact from impurities is not recoverable after firing. - Not measuring slurry pH during transition trials
Switching dispersant type — especially to a high-NaO compound — can shift slurry pH. An uncontrolled pH change can affect clay deflocculation efficiency, green body strength, and downstream process parameters. Monitor slurry pH throughout the trial. - Making a full-scale switch without a production-scale trial phase
Laboratory trials are necessary but not sufficient. Spray drying parameters, batch-to-batch consistency, and handling procedures should all be verified in a limited production run before committing to full-scale adoption.
10. Frequently Asked Questions
Can a ceramic deflocculant completely replace STPP in slurry formulation?
In many production scenarios, a ceramic deflocculant can functionally replace STPP as the primary dispersant in ceramic body slurry. However, a direct 1:1 weight substitution is generally not appropriate — the effective dosage and slurry response will differ based on the specific deflocculant grade and your clay system. A properly managed substitution trial involves adjusting dosage, monitoring Ford Cup flow time and slurry specific gravity, and confirming body strength after drying. Laboratory trials are recommended before full-scale application.
Is a ceramic deflocculant cheaper than STPP per ton of ceramic body?
Cost-effectiveness depends on more than the unit purchase price. Total additive cost per ton of body = unit price × dosage per ton body. Because STPP and ceramic deflocculants differ in effective dosage (by weight), a lower unit price does not automatically translate to lower total cost. Under some sourcing and dosage conditions, a deflocculant may offer a lower total cost per ton of body; under others, STPP may be more cost-effective. The answer requires trial-verified dosage data and your actual procurement prices. Goway does not claim that either product is universally cheaper.
What is the key compositional difference between STPP FG-1003 and deflocculant FG-2017?
STPP FG-1003 is a high-purity single-component product: Na₅P₃O₁₀ content 94%, P₂O₅ 56%, Fe₂O₃ 0.015%, pH (1% solution) 8.0–9.0. FG-2017 is a compound ceramic deflocculant with NaO 30–32% as its primary active constituent and minimal P₂O₅ (0–1%), with a high L.O.I of 55–60%. The two products achieve deflocculation through fundamentally different ionic mechanisms. (Source: Goway Technical Data Sheet)
Does switching to a ceramic deflocculant affect spray drying parameters?
It depends on the specific product and your clay system. If the deflocculant allows a higher slurry solid content at the same target flow time, this may affect spray drying energy consumption and powder moisture content. Conversely, if slurry water demand increases, energy costs may rise. These interactions must be measured in a structured trial. Measure slurry specific gravity and spray drying powder moisture before and after any dispersant change, and do not adjust spray drying parameters without production-scale trial data.
Which Goway STPP grade is recommended for ceramic body slurry?
Goway offers four STPP grades for ceramic applications. FG-1003 (whiteness 90, Na₅P₃O₁₀ 94%, P₂O₅ 56%, Fe₂O₃ 0.015%, pH 8.0–9.0) is suitable for applications with strict purity or whiteness requirements. FG-N5, FG-N8, and FG-N9 differ in P₂O₅ content and pH contribution; they may be considered where cost structure or process pH requirements differ from FG-1003. The appropriate grade depends on your clay system, existing formula, and body color or compliance requirements. (Source: Goway Technical Data Sheet) View STPP grade comparison →
Technical Notes and Testing Conditions
- Data source: All product specifications cited in this article (Na₅P₃O₁₀ content, P₂O₅, Fe₂O₃, NaO, SiO₂, L.O.I, whiteness, pH) are drawn from Goway Technical Data Sheets (TDS) as of the publication date. Parameters are subject to revision; always request the latest batch COA before production use.
- Parameters not listed in TDS: Where a parameter is noted as "not specified in TDS" (e.g., Fe₂O₃ for deflocculant grades), this reflects the actual document — it is not an omission in this article. Contact Goway to request batch COA data for those parameters.
- pH values: pH values for STPP grades are for 1% aqueous solution at ambient temperature. In-slurry pH will differ based on clay type, water quality, and formula composition.
- L.O.I measurement: L.O.I (Loss on Ignition) values are measured at standard calcination conditions. High L.O.I in deflocculant grades reflects volatile and water-associated components and should be considered when evaluating solid content and shelf life.
- Ford Cup flow time: References to slurry flow time use the Ford Cup method as standard. Cup size, temperature, and measurement protocol should be consistent between baseline and trial measurements for valid comparison.
- Disclaimer: Final parameters should be verified against the latest batch COA. Laboratory trials are recommended before full-scale application. Performance claims in this article describe compositional characteristics and established process principles, not guaranteed outcomes. Actual results depend on clay system, water quality, process parameters, and dosage. This article does not constitute a product warranty.
- Evidence classification: Compositional data — Level 2 Engineering Data (TDS/COA, Source: Goway TDS). Mechanism descriptions — Level C (established ceramic science, P2 source). Application scenarios — illustrative framework only (P3, not customer-specific data).
Need Help Choosing Between STPP and a Ceramic Deflocculant?
If you are evaluating these two options for your specific production setup, the Goway technical team can provide:
- Grade selection recommendation based on your clay system and target slurry parameters
- Sample coordination for laboratory or production trial
- Starting dosage guidance for trial protocol design
- TDS, SDS, and batch COA for any Goway product
- Technical consultation for partial or full STPP-to-deflocculant transition
→ Contact Goway with your application details
→ Ceramic Deflocculant product page (FG-2017, FG-MK03, FG-N203B, FG-SL01A)
Keyword：
More News
How to Choose a Dispersant for Spray Drying in Ceramic Production: A Practical Guide
2026-05-09
GOWAY INTERNATIONAL MATERIAL CO., LTD
Founded in 2009, we specialize in producing and supplying ,ceramic additives and related products, committing to supplying stable, environmentally friendly,professional and ceramic materials.
Contact UsContact Us
Company Phone/Wechat：86-0757-82131106 / +8613728575572
Company Fax：86-0757-82131106
Whatapp/skype: +8613600032377
E-mail：info6@goway-china.com
Office Address: Room C11-6, Foshan National Torch Innovation and Pioneer Park, Jihua 2nd Road, Chancheng District, Foshan City, Guangdong Province, China.
Factory Address: Nanbian Industrial Zone, Sanshui District, Foshan City Guangdong Province，China.